MA Research

Back to the Bench?

Understanding the British Manufacturing Jewellers' Transfer to Rearmament and Munitions Production in the Second World War

Map of Central London marked with the locations of jewellery workshops that undertook war contractsMap: Alexander Gross, Authentic Map of London. Produced under the Direction of Alexander Gross. Scale of Miles, 1[ = 65 Mm] (London: Geographers' Map, 1938), British Library Maps 3480.(387.). Photograph and markings: Georgina Izzard

Map of Central London marked with the locations of jewellery workshops that undertook war contracts

Map: Alexander Gross, Authentic Map of London. Produced under the Direction of Alexander Gross. Scale of Miles, 1[ = 65 Mm] (London: Geographers' Map, 1938), British Library Maps 3480.(387.). Photograph and markings: Georgina Izzard

 

V&A/RCA MA History of Design, 2016-18

RCA Student Research Profile

From Britain’s declaration of entry into the Second World War on 3 September 1939, the jewellery industry and other British manufacturing industries faced an uncertain period in their production. Government ministries required both people and munitions and these requirements dramatically altered manufacturing jewellers’ work during the war. This dissertation focuses on the jewellers’ transfer from jewellery manufacture to war work to understand how they adapted their existing skills to new metals, products and production quantities. This conversion has received little attention from jewellery historians and war historians, even though the work helped jewellers maintain their skills ready to support the jewellery industry post-war.

The jewellers’ war experience is discussed in relation to the three different scales that influenced their work: the trade, the workshop and the individual jewellers themselves. Trade publications and trade association records reveal that the jewellers worked closely both socially and geographically in peacetime and that they actively maintained this network during the war. Moreover, the importance the jewellers attributed to the trade structure continued to the workshop; though new people and new machines joined the workshop during the war, the jewellers classified these changes in terms of their existing skill-based structure. New production contracts required new methods of measuring precision, which led the jewellers to identify their war work as engineering, despite continuing to identify themselves as jewellers. Their identification of themselves, other workers and machines in relation to their peacetime occupation demonstrates the cohesive nature and strength of the British jewellery industry.

The design history methodologies used in this investigation emphasise the role of the maker within this production history. Trade publications, company ledgers and blueprints, amongst other primary sources, are analysed both for their content and their design; this analysis reveals the importance of both human and non-human actors in the jewellers’ transfer to war work. This dissertation thus argues that the jewellers maintained their existing structure of human and non-human actors during the war to help them navigate their new work.

https://www.rca.ac.uk/students/georgina-izzard/

Supervisors:

Dr Sarah Teasley, RCA

Clare Phillips, Victoria & Albert Museum